Allahabad High Court Cracks Down on Lawyer for Alleging Judge Bias
By Aaerm Law Associates | June 4, 2025
In a bold and clear stance, the Allahabad High Court has initiated contempt of court proceedings against a lawyer who accused a judge of being biased and dishonest during a bail hearing. The incident occurred in the case of Haribhan Alias Monu Alias Ramakant v. State of Uttar Pradesh, where emotions escalated beyond the limits of courtroom decorum.
⚖️ What Sparked the Contempt Proceedings?
The issue began during a routine bail hearing. Haribhan, the accused, sought bail while facing serious criminal charges under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). During the hearing, the defense lawyer openly accused the presiding judge of partiality and dishonesty.
These accusations were made in open court. Such remarks violate the standards of professional conduct expected from legal practitioners. The High Court viewed the statements as an attack on the integrity of the judiciary.
🧑⚖️ Judge’s Reaction and Court’s Action
Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh, who presided over the case, responded immediately. He ordered the initiation of contempt of court proceedings against the lawyer. The court issued a show-cause notice, requiring the lawyer to explain his behavior.
The judge made it clear: personal attacks on judicial officers not only damage the dignity of the court but also shake public confidence in the legal system.
📜 What Does the Law Say About Contempt of Court?
Under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, any person who scandalizes or lowers the authority of the judiciary may face legal consequences. The law defines criminal contempt in Section 2(c) as:
- Acts that lower the court’s authority
- Interference with judicial proceedings
- Disobedience of court orders
If convicted, a person may face up to six months in prison, a fine of ₹2,000, or both.
In this case, the lawyer’s remarks—if proven—could meet the criteria for criminal contempt. The High Court will evaluate the response to the show-cause notice before proceeding further.
🧑💼 Why Lawyer Conduct Matters in the Courtroom
Lawyers are officers of the court. They have a duty to respect the legal process, maintain courtroom etiquette, and safeguard the dignity of the judiciary. Any deviation from this standard harms not just the court, but also the broader justice system.
The judge’s impartiality is a cornerstone of a democratic legal framework. When lawyers question this without evidence, it crosses the boundary from criticism to contempt.
🏛️ A Wider Message to the Legal Community
This case sets a strong precedent. It signals that unfounded allegations and disrespectful behavior toward judges will have serious consequences. It also highlights the court’s readiness to protect its integrity.
In a time where trust in institutions is fragile, reinforcing the judiciary’s authority becomes crucial. Judges must act fearlessly and impartially, and courts must ensure that their independence is not compromised.
🔍 Possible Outcomes of the Case
Depending on the lawyer’s response to the court’s notice, the judge may:
- Accept the apology, if offered sincerely
- Impose a fine or other penalties
- Refer the matter to the Bar Council of India for disciplinary action
If the court decides to proceed with formal punishment, it will consider the gravity of the remarks and whether the lawyer shows genuine remorse.
📌 Conclusion: Respect for the Judiciary Is Non-Negotiable
The Allahabad High Court’s actions remind legal professionals of their ethical obligations. Courtrooms are not arenas for personal grievances. Rather, they are institutions where facts, law, and respect guide proceedings.
As this case unfolds, it may act as a deterrent to similar conduct in the future. Upholding decorum in the courtroom is not optional—it is essential to the rule of law and the trust citizens place in the judicial system.
Order Link: https://images.assettype.com/barandbench/2025-06-03/ha27ecsm/Haribhan_Alias_Monu_Alias_Ramakant_v_State_of_UP.pdf
